Yet in practice, results only tell part of the story. Without strong underlying financial processes, even positive results can be fragile, inconsistent, or misleading.
For SMEs in particular, the quality of financial processes often determines whether reported results can actually be trusted.
Results are outputs, not evidence
Financial results are outputs of a system. They reflect how transactions were recorded, how consistently rules were applied, and how well information was reviewed.
When processes are weak, results may still look acceptable in the short term. Over time, however, inconsistencies begin to surface:
- Revenue is recognised differently from one period to the next
- Costs are recorded late or without clear cut-off
- Reconciliations are delayed or skipped
- Adjustments become frequent and reactive
At that point, results lose their value as a decision-making tool. They describe what happened, but not reliably enough to guide what should happen next.
Read full article here.